How to reform the BBC

1. Make the BBC totally INDEPENDENT of Government and make them answer to the Licence Fee payer.

2. Stop the BBC being a monoculture controlled by an unrepresentative and unaccountable clique.

3.It is now debased and effectively an ideas monopoly.  A ghetto.  It is the guardian of conventional thinking and suffocates new or opposing ideas.  We need a PLURALITY of ideas free from the BBC’s stifling political control.


PROPOSAL 1

OPEN UP THE DIGITAL BROADCASTING INFRASTRUCTURE TO OTHER INDEPENDENT NEWS PROVIDERS

The digital broadcasting infrastructure should be opened up to many other independent news providers - as the BT infrastructure was opened up.

The technology is there to transmit many simultaneous programmes at any one time.  A sufficient sum should be allocated out of the TV Licence money received by the BBC from us to make any necessary adjustments to the broadcasting infrastructure to enable the broadcasting of many independent news programmes at the same time as BBC News programmes.  We choose which news programme we want to watch by way of a remote. It is a better use for the Licence money than chauffeur-driven cars or air trips for the senior staff.

Since the BBC is owned by the nation and we pay the running costs by means of the TV Licence, the BBC must use its broadcasting infrastructure in accordance with our requirements. And we require that it is used in this way.


PROPOSAL 2

THE BBC TRUST AND THE DIRECTOR GENERAL SHOULD BE ELECTED, NOT APPOINTED

The BBC Trust and the Director General should be elected, not appointed - just as Chief Constables are now to be elected.

The term of office should not exceed two years in length.

Procedures should be set up to allow and enable people from outside the BBC to stand for election.

We should have the right to see the manifestos of the candidates wishing to be the new Director General or a Trustee.  Before we voted for a candidate, we would have the ability to ask them what their policy was on specific matters, such as whether they would be promoting multiculturalism and/or the EU.
  

PROPOSAL 3

OPEN UP THE PROCEDURE FOR APPOINTING STAFF

The BBC's procedures for appointing staff to key posts should be opened up to public gaze and scrutiny and made more accountable to the electorate.

For key and sensitive jobs in the news and current affairs department, it should be possible for the public to add candidates to the short list.  We do not accept that "only insiders know best" - it is the insiders who have abused the system.

Advertisements for ALL posts should also be on the web.  The people who compile the shortlists and members of the appointing panel should be named and their own posts disclosed together with any financial or personal interests.  The reasons for the inclusion of each applicant on the shortlist should be disclosed on the web.

Full reasons for any appointment should be disclosed in writing.

Procedures should be set up to allow and enable people from outside the BBC to apply for any post with provision for redress for any such person if treated unfairly compared to an existing BBC employee.


PROPOSAL 4

NEWS PROGRAMMES SHOULD CONTAIN ONLY INFORMATION, NOT OPINION

Opinion should not be confused with information.  Broadcast news programmes should not contain opinion from BBC journalists or from "experts" or "random" members of the public or from anyone; merely the facts.  We are able to form our own opinions.  There should be specific Comment programmes with safeguards as to balance, and then specific news information programmes.


PROPOSAL 5

ANYONE WORKING IN NEWS BROADCASTING SHOULD BE SUBJECT TO PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS AND DISCIPLINE

Each individual member of staff should, by contract of employment or engagement, be made PERSONALLY responsible for the truthfulness, fairness, honesty and accuracy of what they write, do and say - with sanctions imposed against them PERSONALLY for any breach.

These professional standards should provide, inter alia, for the following:

1.    All staff are to comply with a CODE OF STANDARDS; this will cover inter alia:-

    (1)    Personal ethics and behaviour

    (2)    Professional competence

    (3)    A legal duty requiring fairness, honesty and openness

2.    A REGISTER OF INTERESTS (published in real time on the web) where all financial benefits received or given and membership of or affiliation to or association with or assistance given to any political organisation (such as a political party, pressure group, trade union, campaigning charity or indeed Common Purpose) have to be disclosed.

3.    Disciplinary procedures for dealing with any breach with powers of imposing monetary fines and/or dismissal and/or subsequent prohibition (temporarily  or permanently) from being employed by or being a contractor for, any broadcaster broadcasting to this country.

The disciplinary procedures of the Law Society and the Institute of Chartered Accountants give an excellent precedent or template.  The members of the disciplinary tribunal should not be employees of the BBC.

Any member of the public should be able to initiate a complaint.


PROPOSAL 6

EVERY PROGRAMME WEBPAGE SHOULD HAVE A COMMENT SECTION

There should be a comment section on the web page for each programme on the BBC website. Moderation should be done by an independent outside body who would publish their policy.

Give us back our police - cancel all Labour's police targets

The Police have become the enemy of the people.  They are predators and prey on the people to meet the targets Labour made them meet.  They are now hated parasites.

They have stopped being a solution - they are now the PROBLEM and get in our way.

These targets have been catastrophic in destroying the ethos of the police.

We want the police to behave like they used to do - protecting us not preying on us.

Give us back our police - cancel all targets imposed on the police by Labour.

What an amazing sense of relief

It is not a sense of triumphalism, or revenge or anything really, except an amazing sense of relief.

Stop Brown shredding the evidence

Brown must be stopped from shredding the evidence of all the dirt from all the years of corruption.

The years of corruption and bullying need cathartic sunlight.  We must know what has been happening.  Then the healing may be allowed to start.

The Tories should boycott Parliament, and stop it working

The Left are trying to pull off an unconstitutional putsch.

The Tories have appeased the Left for 5 years.  How much more are they going to allow?

If the Tories are prevented from governing:

1. They should boycott the Opening of Parliament.

2. They should bring the working of Parliament to a complete standstill by procedural tactics.

3. They should interfere with the workings of government in every way possible.

3. They should organise demonstrations and marches.

4. They should NEVER accept that it is business as usual.

If the wet Tories finally get a backbone and give a lead, we will follow.

But it is suddenly a different world and a real fight is required, and I have to be persuaded that Cameron is up to such a fight.  I hope so, but History shows that appeasers do not make good war leaders.

If no deal with the LibDems is agreed, then the aims should be:-

1. total non-cooperation and civil disobediance until Labour are forced out of Number 10 and the Tories are allowed to take over; 

2. the Tories should then govern as a minority, as Alex Salmond has shown is quite possible.

If Brown stays in power in any form, it will be an illegal coup d'état

There is no precedent or convention that the incumbent Prime Minister has the first right to try to form a government as such circumstances have never occurred in modern times.  The party with the largest number of seats obviously has this right.

If Brown seeks to stay on as PM and the Civil Service accept his orders, it will be a coup d'état and illegal.

Brown and any person purporting to act in the capacity of "Minister of the Crown" or to carry out their "orders" - including policemen and security men - would  be acting unlawfully and I would then claim the right of self-defence against them - as I would against any criminal.  I would also claim the right to make a Citizen's Arrest on any of them.

No laws or regulations of any sort putatively passed by such a criminal gang would have the force of law, so far as I was concerned.

I would not recognise the authority of any police officer or Criminal Court seeking to enforce any such law as they would not have any lawful authority and so would be operating ultra vires. 

Moreover, in law, the Prime Minister is appointed by the Queen and the Queen also has the power to dismiss the Prime Minister.

In those circumstances, I would therefore insist that the Queen as Defender of the Realm acts in an appropriate manner to defend me and my rights against a usurper, and to dismiss Brown as the criminal he would be. 

This is my damn Country, not theirs.

Call in IMF to make an immediate audit of Labour's hidden debt

If the Tories form the next government as now seems likely because of Clegg’s statement, there are two immediate things they should do.

1.    Get the IMF in to make an independent audit of the national indebtedness including all the hidden and off-balance sheet debt, and so undermine the inevitable screams from Labour and BBC with all their lies and misrepresention, that cutting the debt is unnecessary and dangerous and "will damage the recovery" ( I could write the script now).

2.    Stop the scandal of millions of pounds of public money being fraudulently laundered to the Labour Party through the Unions by means of the "Union Modernisation Fund" scam.  Labour must live on its own or die.

End the Union. Scottish Labour and LibDems have no legitimacy to rule in England.

So I have this right do I?

Brown has 2 milliion less votes (at 9:30am) and less seats than the Tories but he will not leave Downing Street.

The monster intends to continue in power using Scottish Labour MPs to enable him to rule in England.

England has been colonised by Scottish people.  The English are being taken for complete mugs.

If this is what the Union means, then stuff it. 

English UDI needed.

Will Brown leave 10 Downing Street if Tories get most seats?

The precedent from Scotland is that the party with the largest number of seats is given the first chance to form a government.

Brown has a serious mental disorder.  He is a very weak man psychologically and to compensate and fill the gap, he craves power over others to enhance his sense of importance; without it he may have a nervous breakdown. 

If the Tories get most seats in a hung Parliament, will Brown leave 10 Downing Street voluntarily?

Do not underestimate this man.  Seriously ill people can do anything to save themselves.

This is not a person with any integrity or decency whatsoever.  This individual is completely malevolent and unscrupulous.  He thinks entirely of himself and his own needs.  He would be very dangerous and damaging in any walk of life.   

Brown thinks he can stay on if there is a hung Parliament

According to the Guardian, Brown thinks there is a “precedent” that if there is a hung Parliament, he as incumbent PM gets the first right to try to form a Government - even if he gets less seats and less votes than the Tories.

This, of course, would mean that he would make a deal with the LIbDems, giving them PR.

That would mean that we would never get out of the EU.

There is no such “precedent”.  It is another trick by Brown to keep power.

The only rule is that the Party with the largest number of seats gets the first chance - as in Scotland.

If Brown succeeded in clinging on and forming such a “Government”,  I would not accept that any such “Government” was lawful.  All its activities would be unlawful.

The Dark Curse which fouls our country

A Dark Curse descended over a gentle land.

This Darkness hates any individual striving for the Light.

This life-sucking parasite tries to prevent decency and personal responsibility with every means at its disposal.
                   
In countless ways the Curse seeks to restrict the autonomy, self-expression, personal responsibility and spiritual growth of the individual.

It confuses the weak-minded with systematic lies and deceit.  It silences with bullying and intent to hurt.  It pretends to virtue with noble words to confuse the gullible, but Its acts result in decay.

The Curse creates division, discord and hate by setting one group against another.   

It weakens others by denigrating self-reliance and self-responsibility to create dependence on itself - and so enhances Its power.

Like the vampire it is, it seeks power, power and more power - by depriving others of their’s.

It exists by creating decay and dissolution.  It thrives whilst causing degeneration in others.

Through its control of TV it fills the minds of the hapless with every conceivable image of contamination, conflict, pain, degradation and degeneracy to weaken and cause spiritual carelessness in the supine viewer by causing negative and destructive thought forms.
                                   
The battleground is the media and for decades those opposed to the Darkness have had to watch the Darkness control the media and peddle decay, powerless to stop it.

Watch carefully those rich, privileged media and TV people from the Left who speak in support of it or twist TV News to protect it. Mark them well and remember who they are - for their activities, which pay them so well, are actively assisting the Darkness to retain control and continue its work.  They are the guilty ones who have enabled the devastation to take place.  When they have before their eyes the actual evidence of the destruction of the workings of their creed, they still prostitute and degrade themselves by still demanding more; why is this?  What is it in the characters of Polly Toynbee, Jackie Ashley, Nick Cohen, Jonathan Freedland, Seamus Milne, Steve Richards, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Johann Hari etc etc that attracts them to the Darkness and the promotion of human unhappiness?

Throughout the ages, the Curse has used the presence of extreme selfishness, personal weakness, callous self-indulgence and greed in the character of the ruling elite, to reappear and enjoy once again the unhappiness, self-destruction and despair of others.

It is among us and over us now.

During Its thirteen years of rampant, exuberant freedom it has rotted and caused decay in the very fabric of every aspect of Society.  It wants to continue.

Will this Curse be beaten on Thursday?  I do not know.

If beaten however, it will only seek to return.

The Darkness will scream and claw and scratch and spit its hate to prevent the coffin lid being screwed down.

Only the twisted and malignant, the ignorant, and the weak-minded who have allowed themselves to be duped, will support and aid this life-sucking Darkness.

Those who value truth, decency, honesty, love, kindness and light have no option but to link arms and oppose it.

It cannot live in the light.  It needs darkness to work, live and breed.
   
However, every candle helps to dispel the dark.

If it survives on Thursday, I vow to fight it with every weapon of the Light at my disposal.

If there is a hung Parliament

If there is a hung Parliament with the Tories with the largest number of seats:-

1    The Queen MUST ask Cameron as leader of the largest Party to try to form a government.

2.    Cameron should do so.  He should follow the lead of Alex Salmond and form a minority government with NO FORMAL COALITION with the LibDems.

3.    Cameron must immediately launch into the fastest possible drive to introduce localism (all the aspects of The Plan), electoral reform (to remove the Labour bias and fraud) and reform of the scandal of Broadcast News actively promoting Labour. Dare the LibDems to vote against that agenda, and shame them if they don't.

Clegg the scum

I read the Mail article on Clegg today.

If the information in the article is true, then I am absolutely disgusted.

Is there no redress against organised, deliberate lying and deceit?
 
He is the product of an ultra privileged background with every advantage.  Yet he is moral scum.

He represents this immoral, shallow, lying, deceitful, greedy, outrageously hypocritical, utterly selfish, elite obsessed as it is with power for self, celebrity for self and mega money for self - and they control every aspect of our society and country, filling the airwaves with their smug vanity and corrupt personal views.

They are just out for themselves, THEMSELVES,  THEMSELVES, THEMSELVES, THEMSELVES, THEMSELVES, THEMSELVES, THEMSELVES,

I am in the mood for revolution.

It is absolutely vital to stop Brown retaining power

Brown is completely unfit to have power as he abuses and misuses it for selfish reasons.

He is a very psychologically weak person.  Deep down within himself he is very insecure. 

So he compensates for this by getting POWER over others.

He craves POWER over others and the feeling of importance it gives him, like a gambler needs his gambling, druggies need their drugs and alcoholics need their alcohol.

He has a serious medical problem.

This has caused him to spend a lifetime from his very early years routinely lying, cheating, bullying and indulging in all manner of other rotten, dirty human behaviour to get his supremacy.  Like any other person suffering from an obsession he will do ANYTHING to satisfy his craving.

It is well known that the obsessions of gambling, drug addiction and alcoholism corrupt the soul, and corrupt it absolutely.  Brown’s obsession and craving for power and importance has had the same effect on him.

If he once knew the meaning of honour, truth and decency, he has lost it now - as almost invariably happens to long term gamblers and alcoholics.

He is so determined, indeed desperate, to have and keep power over others that he does not care what damage is caused to them.

This person has lived his whole life lying, cheating and bullying.  He will say the complete opposite of the truth and stare you in the face with a synthetic and practised look of total sincerity.

This lying and cheating and bullying has gone on for so long that his very being, the very depth of his nature, is now corrupted and he lives in a dark, murky world of hate and selfishness. 

He does not want power to do anything with it.  He does not want power to help his fellow man.  For him, he wants power to fill the hole in his soul.  For him, power over others is an end in itself.

He invariably gets what he wants because, unlike normal healthy people, he spends all his time obsessively thinking about getting his own way.

His every thought seems to be geared to getting more power for himself, and creates human unhappiness wherever he goes.

He uses everyone for his own purposes, and creates human unhappiness wherever he goes.

He makes government policy serve his own interests and not the interests of the people or of the country, and creates human unhappiness wherever he goes.

He sees everything in terms of what is good for him personally, and creates human unhappiness wherever he goes.

There is always an ulterior motive to everything he does; the great mistake is to take at face value any reasons he gives for doing anything, for it is invariably wrong and a deceit.

He introduces government policies as a form of public relations - merely to create the IMPRESSION of something favourable to him. It is difficult to think of many policies brought in by this man which have been for the benefit of others.  Almost always they have been brought in either to make him look good or to outmanoeuvre his opponents.  When the headline has been achieved, implementation has not mattered.  It did not matter whether the policy worked or not. As a result, his policies and/or the implementation of them have been flawed, and they have often been actively counterproductive.

Things are not done well simply because the leader’s mind is not on the job, for he is thinking all the time how to turn every situation to his own personal advantage; he is only thinking about policies which benefit him personally.

This creature has had such unrestrained power for so many years, that he has been able to corrupt and subvert the very nature of the machinery of government (particularly through the use of political targets and the political commissars introduced at high levels in every government department) so that now the primary duty and purpose of all government departments and all public bodies is to serve the POLITICAL interests of the ruling party - which means in effect, Brown.  Government is now run not for the interests of the people or even for the interests of those affected by government - but for HIS interests.

Power has now been concentrated to an unprecedented degree in his hands.  And what has he done with it?  He has used it for his own benefit.

As a result he has corroded and degraded all aspects of our society.  This man is a CURSE on all decent people.

The deep and unpardonable crime of the MSM is that they knew all this but allowed it to happen and to continue.

Because his motivation is so selfish, whatever he touches, he corrupts - like a fly spreads disease wherever it walks.  It is its nature.

It was the country’s deepest misfortune to have someone of this nature exercising almost limitless powers for some thirteen years.

This is a very immature person.  He has such lack of self-control that when he feels threatened his temper is monstrous, his bullying is famous and notorious, his lying is systemic and natural, his cheating and deceit is second nature.

He has a frightening capacity to hate, he REALLY hates anyone who crosses him, or threatens him.

His ability to keep grievances and resentment is legendary.

He will say anything to achieve his goals.  If that does not work, he will say the opposite the following week.

If this deeply malicious and malignant creature feels threatened by someone, his instinct is to destroy them with any means he has.  He will use his team of professional liars to say ANYTHING against the other person to cast doubt on the integrity of the person concerned, in the hope that this will undermine the messenger so badly that the message is weakened.

This is not a normal person, this is a warped and monstrous person.

He should be receiving medical treatment but, dammit, he runs the government.

He will accuse his opponents of doing the same dirty, selfish things he does.

He will accuse his opponents of having the same dirty, selfish motives he has.

It is quite simple to know this odious man’s own true actions, thoughts or motives - you just listen to what he says about others. 

Exhibiting this level of hating, holding grievances, lying, cheating, anger, concern for self over others, intent to deliberately hurt and destroy for selfish reasons, misuse of power over others for self is not an indicator of a good person; in fact it is an indicator of a rotten, evil person.

Some people think he is incompetent - but this is to misread him.

It is not good enough to call him the “Prime Mentalist”. No, the disease is much deeper than that.  It is much more serious than that.

He has the mentality of a crime boss.  A person endlessly seeking total power over others for self.  A totalitarian. 

He will not stop seeking more and more power.

He is like a parasitic lifeform sucking the life energy out of others for his own advantage; needing to feed on others to sustain himself.

It is not known if he was ever capable of having normal emotions, but if he did, this seems to have gone, as he has spent a lifetime twisting them by faking feelings to achieve an advantage, living a life of deceiving others, pretending something to gain an advantage.  He fakes decency, but it does not seem that he really feels it.  He just turns faked emotions on - then just as quickly turns them off.  That is why he looks so weird when he smiles, because it is not genuine.

This monster just has no understanding of Honesty except as a weakness in an opponent which he can exploit.

He is quite unable to stop, for if this person ever lost power over others he would psychologically implode. 

Such people are so psychopathic, so immature, so undeveloped, that they should always be kept away from all power over others, as they ALWAYS misuse it. 

Such entities are deeply dangerous and damaging to all they meet for they are always seeking to secure a personal advantage. 

Such people never stop their malignant behaviour on their own accord - they have to be actively STOPPED by others. Will he ever be stopped?

If this hellish person is not stopped he will continue concentrating power in his own hands and getting more and more power over individuals to feed his own needs, and this country will be turned into a tyranny and a nightmare.

If he wins the election, he will complete the changes he has already gone so far with, and will so completely change the face of this country that he will be unstoppable.

Brown must be removed NOW at all costs - or it will be too late.

(Cross posted on The UK News Network)

Lessons from the Great Ruination 1997 - 20 ?? - Lesson 2

(Or how to corrupt, corrode and ruin a lovely, decent and gentle country)

Ask Labour how to really ruin a country.

Lesson 2:

 

Create what is effectively a one man dictatorship.

Set up a quangoland where the vast majority of the decisions and rules which affect us are made by quangos run by Labour cronies utterly and completely dependent for their salaries and status on Brown, answering solely to Brown and dismissible on the Führer raising his little finger - and not in any way answerable to the electorate and so cannot be removed by us. 

For Labour are the real experts.

Lessons from the Great Ruination 1997 - 20??

(Or how to corrupt, corrode and ruin a lovely, decent and gentle country)

Ask Labour how to really ruin a country.

Lesson 1:

How to destroy a financial system, and claim you are the saviours. 

1. Gratuitously destroy a tried, tested and WORKING bank regulation system (which was designed, inter alia, to protect responsible banks from unfair and destructive competition from irresponsible cowboy financial institutions) and replace it with a moronic and weakly ineffectual system.

This made it inevitable that ALL banks and financial institutions, to keep their share price up and survive in a fiercely competitive market, had to throw caution out of the window (together with a hundred years of banking wisdom and practice) in a mad chase after more and more money, by lending to the wrong people on the wrong terms

Thus was caused the biggest financial crisis and disaster ever.

2. Nationalise the banks.

3. With utter meltdown staring you in the face, throw money at your nationalised banks and print money in complete panic by taking on debt so immense and so unprecedented that we may never be able to pay it back, (but ensuring the million pound bonuses of your banking friends, of course).

Thus mortgaging the future of this country and its people for generations to come.

Thus neatly giving the problem to someone else.

4. After all that and having caused it all, get your tame TV toady whores (yes Peston, we are looking at you) to lie and praise you - treating you as noble and virtuous and very clever - so enabling you to claim credit for the whole mess as a huge success.  Job done.  (Pity about our children and grandchildren though)

For Labour are the real experts.

The Leprechaun's offer. Did I make the right choice?

Anyway, there was bright moonlight that night as I was walking home over the mountain at 3:30 am - jumping over streams, avoiding bogs and whistling a merry tune as I went. 

Suddenly this Leprechaun jumped out in front of me.  All little and green, smoking a pipe and wearing a Leprechaun hat with a buckle (as they do).

I thought quick as a flash, “Oh, that’s a Leprechaun”.  (I am actually bloody clever).

He said in a soft Kerry accent, “Look, I give you one wish”.  He was a very nice Leprechaun.  Said he, “You can have great wealth or peace of mind, but not both - which is it to be?”

I chose peace of mind. 

Was I right?

I am not a chattel

It seems very simple to Marcellus.

Since the State has ceased to benefit the individual and is in fact predating on the individual to feed itself, it has become immoral and a parasite. They have stopped being our government and have become an occupying force. The Social Contract is therefore broken.

Accordingly, the laws it passes are without any moral value and there is no moral requirement on any of us to obey them. 

They will therefore have to use brute force or trickery.

If they use brute force to enforce an illegal and immoral law then:-

1. Each enforcing officer will be acting illegally and be unable to claim that he/she was only following orders.
2. All courts of law, from the Magistrates Court to Straw's new, artificial, formica, toytown, Supreme Court, have no jurisdiction to try Marcellus. 

I am not a chattel of their damned State to be disposed of.

They exist to serve me - not the other way round.

A list of BBC-Labour people who control our information

Here we have evidence of the stitch up by Labour and the BBC and how they have controlled the information we are allowed to hear.

The effect of the presentation of news by the BBC is now so awesome that it now completely dominates the outcomes of elections.

To pretend that the BBC does not have a political effect is ludicrous. 

Labour supporters have been at the very heart of the BBC holding key political roles.  These people have been open and declared political party activists before, after and even during their BBC service.

For the last 15 years or so, the BBC has had a declared Labour supporter/donor as either Chairman or Director General - or both.

The two key people in charge of the BBC's strategic direction in the run up to Labour's 1997 election victory have had VERY close links with Brown and Blair.

Ed Richards worked for Gordon Brown and was later to become BBC Controller of Corporate Strategy, and is now boss of OFCOM

Bill Bush was Head of Political Research and Analysis at the BBC.   He then became “Head of Research” for Tony Blair.  He later took a position as Special Adviser to New Labour culture minister Tessa Jowell. As Minister for Culture, Media and Sport, Jowell and Bush were responsible for Government policy towards the BBC including renegotiating the licence fee.

Access to news presented in an accurate and truthful way is akin to a human right.

When supporters of a political party control the monopoly BBC monster, then there will be twisting, brainwashing and corruption.  And there has been twisting, brainwashing and corruption.  Every hour of every day of the damn week there is twisting, brainwashing and corruption. Such a situation is completely unacceptable in a mature information-based democracy.

It has been proved over the last 13 years that for electoral success all you really need is to be able to control the minds of the electorate by the drip, drip, drip of political indoctrination and propaganda through a controlled monopoly news broadcaster.

As long as you have that, you can do all the damage you want to that electorate - they still vote for you in millions and millions.

For an examination of the techniques used by the left to corrupt broadcast news and the constitutional outrage that this causes - see here

For a discussion on the mind-bending and politically toxic effect of TV and the stupidifying of the Brits - see here and here

Here are some of the links between Labour and the BBC - and these are just the ones we know about.

Remember each one of these people.  These are the people who enabled Labour to contaminate, degrade and wreck our society - enabled Labour to take our country away from us and give it into the hands of others (even Hitler did not succeed in doing that).

This is an ongoing project so if anyone can add any more (or point out any errors - we don't do Labour lies and smears here), please get in touch and they will be added to the list, or the correction made.



John Birt

BBC Director General 1992 - 2000

At the time of his appointment he was a paid up member of the Labour party.

According to fellow broadcaster Peter Bazalgette writing in the Observer :- "....his streak of ruthlessness helped turn the BBC ....into the most powerful political lobby in Britain."

He reportedly left with a payout of £784,000 and an annual pension of £130,000.

He is reported to have been a friend of Peter Mandelson since they worked together at LWT - they have been on Tuscan walking holidays together and Mandelson was Birt's guest at the 1997 FA Cup Final. Former "Crime Czar", later became an adviser on transport in the Cabinet Office Forward Strategy Unit. He was appointed "Personal Strategic Adviser to Tony Blair".



Greg Dyke

BBC Director General 2000-2004

He had been a Labour donor and lifelong Labour activist.

In 1977 he stood as a Labour candidate for the Greater London Council.

In the run up to the 1997 election he reportedly donated over £50,000 to the Labour party.

When he was appointed, according to the Guardian, a Number 10 insider said "We loved Greg. We loved the idea of Greg."

This is the person who thought that there should be a BBC man in news programmes to tell us what to think and who boasted about the BBC news programmes for "the rich mix of news, and insight delivered by the network's news programmes. They are a focal point for national discussion and debate and a crucial public service."

He wanted even more informed analysis and comment in news  programmes.  This is one of the most corrupting aspects of news programmes, the mind-controlling Robinson effect and the main way that Labour's message always contaminates the news.



Gavin Davies

BBC Chairman 2001 - 2004

He had been a lifelong Labour party member and financial supporter.

From 1974 to 1979 he worked as an adviser to two Labour governments.

From 1992 to 1997 he was an adviser to the Chancellor Gordon Brown. Gavin Davies is a close personal friend of Brown and his wife, Sue Nye, is Brown's private secretary.



Sir Michael Lyons

Current BBC Chairman

Sir Michael Lyons was chosen in 2007 by the Labour Government to be chairman of the new BBC Trust - supposedly set up to represent the interests of licence fee payers.

Before that he had been paid around £500,000 by the Government to carry out three studies for Chancellor Gordon Brown.

Prior to that he was a Labour local politician, sitting as a Labour councillor in several authorities and as Chief Executive of Birmingham City Council.



Ben Bradshaw

Labour MP

Former Environment minister

Is a former BBC Radio 4 reporter.



Chris Bryant

Labour MP for Rhondda.

He first joined the Labour Party in 1966 and became a Party Agent in 1991.

From 1993 to 1998 he served as a Labour councillor in Hackney.

In 1997 he stood unsuccessfully as a Labour candidate for Wycombe and then joined the BBC in 1998 as Head of European Affairs.

In 2000 he was selected for the Rhondda seat and finally became an MP.



Celia Barlow

Labour MP for Hove and Parliamentary Private Secretary to the Minister for Climate Change.

Celia joined the Labour Party and her first trade union when she was 16.

Between 1983 and 1995 she was a BBC Westminster reporter and finally BBC Home News Editor.

While she was at the BBC she was Secretary of Chelsea Constituency Labour Party, and later she became Chair.



Phil Woolas

Labour MP for Oldham and Saddleworth

Minister for the Environment.

He first joined the Labour Party at the age of 16 and was active in student politics, becoming President of the National Union of Students.

From 1988 - 1990 he was a producer on the BBC Newsnight Programme.

He was then a trade union official before standing for Parliament in 1997.



James Purnell

Labour MP 

Was Work and Pensions Minister.

He was BBC Head of Corporate Planning before he became a Downing Street adviser in 1997.

Prior to that he worked for the the Institute of Public Policy Research, the left wing think tank.

While still a student, prior to the 1992 election, he worked as a researcher for Tony Blair.



Denis MacShane

Worked for the BBC from 1969 to 1977, including as a newsreader and reporter.

Has been Labour Member of Parliament for Rotherham since 1994. Labour Minister of State for Europe from 2002 to 2005.



Ed Richards

Ex BBC Controller of Corporate Strategy

Ed Richards was Controller of Corporate Strategy at the BBC until 1999. Before that he was an adviser to Gordon Brown.

He left the BBC in 1999 to become Tony Blair's senior policy adviser on media, telecoms, internet and e-government.

As a policy researcher at No 10 ahead of the 2002 general election, he was responsible for drawing up a key political strategy outlining a "vision of what Britain should be like at the end of a second Labour term".

According to the Guardian, he is a quintessential New Labour man.

While at Downing Street, he helped draft the act which established the broadcasting regulator OFCOM.

In 2006 he became chief executive of OFCOM, at a salary reported to be some £392,056 (including benefits and pension entitlement). OFCOM is responsible for adjudicating complaints against the BBC.

Ed Richards has dismissed accusations of New Labour cronyism as "tittle tattle"



Tom Kelly

Ex BBC NI Head of News

Tom Kelly spent 16 years at the BBC in London and Northern Ireland.

He was a political editor and later head of news at BBC Northern Ireland before crossing the divide between those who report the news and those who help to shape the government's message, becoming director of communications at the Northern Ireland Office shortly after New Labour came to power.

In 2001 he became one of Tony Blair's official spokesmen.



Bill Bush

Ex BBC Head of Political Research and Analysis

Bill Bush was "Red" Ken Livingston's Chief of Staff and right hand man at the old "loony left" GLC.

In 1990 he became Head of Political Research and Analysis at the BBC.

He then became "Head of Research" for Tony Blair, and later took a position as Special Adviser to New Labour culture minister Tessa Jowell.

As Minister for Culture, Media and Sport, Jowell and Bush were responsible for Government policy towards the BBC including renegotiating the licence fee.

The Guardian said:- “Bill Bush, the head of the BBC's political research department, left to join the research unit at Number 10. This was a man who had access to the most sensitive information the BBC has on MPs, their parties and the government. His value to the Labour party can hardly be over-estimated"



Catherine Rimmer

Ex BBC Political Research

Catherine Rimmer was Bill Bush's assistant at BBC Political Research.

A former Bush colleague, who has also travelled the short distance from the BBC's Millbank offices, which coordinates all political coverage, to Downing Street.

She left with him to join the Downing Street research group.

The Spectator is reported to have said :-... (Bush) is also taking with him the deputy head of the BBC's political research unit, one Catherine Rimmer. In fact, you could say that the BBC's political research unit has turned out to be an invisible branch of the Labour party".



Geoff Mulgan

BBC Reporter

According to John Harris in the Guardian

"When someone finally gets round to making the definitive New Labour movie - and you can imagine it: Our Friends In The North meets Primary Colors, with the inevitable Britpop soundtrack - they will have to base at least one character on Geoff Mulgan. The PR at his publisher emails his CV to me the day before we meet, and it is so packed with the stuff of recent history that you wonder how he has found time to fit it all in. From the top, then: "Between 1997 and 2004, Geoff had various roles in government including director of the government's strategy unit and head of policy in the Prime Minister's Office . . . Before that, he was founder and director of Demos, described by the Economist as the UK's most influential thinktank . . . chief adviser to Gordon Brown . . . [and] a reporter for the BBC."



Catriona Renton

Reporter for the BBC Politics Show and BBC Presenter.

Catriona Renton is a former Glasgow Labour Councillor, who represented Kelvindale before losing her seat to the LibDems in 2003.  She was “Glasgow’s Youth Tsar”.

This product of Balliol College, Oxford went on to represent Labour in both the 2003 Holyrood elections and the 2004 European elections.

She was apparently recruited by BBC Scotland's parliamentary unit in 2006, where John Boothman, husband of Labour MSP and ex-Health Minister Susan Deacon, was a senior producer.

Her personal facebook has listed the following as friends:

  Jackie Baille Labour MSP
  Yousuf Hamid Labour Activist
  Tom Harris Labour MP
  Mike Dailly Labour Activist
  David Martin Labour MEP
  Frank McAvetty Labour MSP
  John Robertson Labour MP
  John Park Labour MSP
  Steven Purcell Labour Glasgow Leader
  Dave Watson Vice-chair of the Scottish Labour Party
  (Hat tip Our Scotland.)

She was apparently the centre of a bias storm after an item broadcast on Sunday 18 October 2009 attributed views to senior SNP MSP Alex Neil that he had not expressed.  When filming at the SNP conference in Inverness, Catriona Renton had claimed on BBC Scotland’s Politics Show that Alex Neil had confirmed the SNP’s desire to see David Cameron become the Prime Minister at the next general election. The recorded interview with Mr Neil that followed Ms Renton’s claim contained no such confirmation. The BBC were forced to issue a personal apology to Alex Neil. 
(Hat tip Newsnet Scotland.)



Lance Price

BBC Journalist 1981 - 1998

Lance Price joined the BBC as a trainee journalist and worked there for 17 years.

He left in 1998 to work as Alistair Campbell's assistant in Downing Street.

In 2000 he became the Labour Party's Director of Communications.

Now he is a freelance journalist writing mainly for the Guardian and broadcasting for the BBC - again



Tim Luckhurst

Scottish News Editor

Previously a Labour spin doctor



Sue Nye

Wife of Gavyn Davies, and has acted as Gordon Brown's political secretary.



Sarah Hunter

Held the broadcasting brief at No 10. She formerly worked in the BBC Policy Directorate and is also a veteran of the Channel 4 Policy Department. God-daughter of former Lord Chancellor Derry Irvine.



Katie Kay

Lord Birt's former diary secretary, worked for Mr Blair.



Charlie Whelan

Was for years a key Labour activist and news manager and spinner for Gordon Brown. He acted as a commentator and political journalist for Radio Five, and reported on the Conservative Spring Conference 2003 for Radio Five Live.

   

Andrew Marr

Has his own politics show on BBC TV and radio programme.

Is a former editor and chief political commentator of the Independent. His wife is Jackie Ashley, the Guardian political columnist, former BBC employee and cheerleader for Gordon Brown.

Student Labour organiser.



Michael Crick

Newsnight Political Editor

Labour activist and Labour prospective parliamentary candidate.



Martin Sixsmith

BBC Foreign Correspondent 1980 - 1997

Martin Sixsmith joined the BBC in 1980 and worked as a a foreign correspondent in Brussels, Geneva, Moscow and Washington.

Following the 1997 election he left the BBC to work for the Labour government as Director of Communications.

He described his enthusiasm for his new job, when he later told the Independent :- "It was May 1997, it was a new start after 18 years of Tory misrule.....".

He was later Press Secretary to Labour Ministers Harriet Harman and Alistair Darling.

After a brief period in the private sector, he returned to the government in 2001 as Director of Communications for the Department of Transport

He is now once more a regular broadcaster for the BBC.



Joy Johnson

BBC Political News Editor 1992 - 1995

Joy Johnson was a BBC political journalist and became Political News Editor in 1992 at the Millbank centre.

In 1995 she was recruited by Gordon Brown to join New Labour as Campaigns Director, responsible for winning Labour's 80 target seats.

Left in 1996 and then became chief spin doctor for "Red Ken" Livingstone at the GLA.



Sam Jaffa

BBC North America Correspondent.

Husband of Celia Barlow MP

He stood as Labour candidate for Eastleigh in 2001.

Don Brind

Political reporter for the BBC in the south-east of England

According to the Guardian became a Labour party press officer. 



Peter Hyman

BBC producer

Strategic Communications Unit.

Former Labour Party press officer, BBC producer and Sky News journalist. He became the Policy Directorate's media analyst. He worked as a researcher for Donald Dewar and John Smith.



Sarah Hunter

BBC Policy Directorate

Part of the team that travelled with Tony Blair on his 2001 election campaign bus, and worked for the Labour Party in Opposition. In the past she has worked for Peter Mandelson.

Hat tip to BBC Pioneers.  Marcellus is very grateful to BBC Pioneers for much of the research and information upon which this article is based.  The information needed a continued airing.

The State is immoral and has no right to continue to exist in its current form

For years the Brits have increasingly allowed all major decisions to be made for them by the State.

In the last 13 years however there has been a total change in the nature of the state - deliberately engineered by Labour.  We can call this new, malign creature the “Controlling State”. 

The Controlling State is a vampire.  A monster.

The unspoken aim of the Controlling State is to disempower the individual, as this increases the power of the State.

To compound the problem, by a ruthless misuse of power the Controlling State is now effectively in the firm control of a small handful of people.  These are truly dark and dangerous people motivated entirely by selfishness and keen only to enhance their own power at the expense of others.

To confuse people and make them submit uncomplainingly to being disempowered, the Controlling State peddles a pernicious and outrageous lie.

This lie is that choice and the personal ability of the individual to improve their lives and the lives of their families by effort and hard work makes society “unequal”, and this is presented by the corrupt State broadcaster as self evidently immoral and a social evil.   

The Controlling State may talk the language of choice but it doesn’t mean it as it never happens.  In fact, it is actively against choice as this empowers the individual - and everything it does is aimed at disempowering the individual.

The argument goes as follows: there must be no private provision of any particular service as it is only by the State providing that service that “equality” can be guaranteed.  The individual must not do anything as an individual as this would be “socially irresponsible”.

We did not hear so much about the evils of inequality when nationalised banks had to bailed out with our money and the bankers still got their million pound bonuses.  We do not hear so much about the evils of inequality in connection with the incomes of footballers, celebrities, BBC staff or CEOs of quangos.  Moreover, it appears, according to a body set up by Harriet Harman’s own department, that after 13 years of Labour government the “inequality” in society has now returned to levels not seen since the Second World War.  Mr Mandelson has famously said that he has no problem with people being “filthy rich”.

No, the whole concept of inequality is a preposterous lie.

In fact the whole bogus promotion of “equality” is merely a device to disempower the individual - and make us all dependent on the Controlling State.

The aim is to discourage anyone from taking responsibility for themselves, their families or their communities.

If any strong minded person tries to take responsibility, it seems the police are soon on the scene arresting the wrong people.

The Brits are now so used to having everything done for them that they seem quite unable to think for themselves.  They seem to have lost the ability to do anything for themselves.  They are like naked battery chickens dependent on the warmth of their huts provided from outside.  So they have lost their feathers.     

If the warmth in the hut were ever to be turned off, the naked chickens would be defenceless.

That defencelessness and dependence is the aim.  It gives power to the Controlling State.  And to the Few.

This, together with the destabilising fear of deliberately intimidating officialdom with its unfair enforcement of unreasonable rules, the intrusion into their lives and homes by a huge army of officials, the criminalizing of thought and the outlawing of numerous forms of political opposition known and used legitimately by many previous generations, has sucked the enterprise and confidence out of the pathetic and cowed Brits. 

There is a remorseless attack on the individual.  The Controlling State tries to curtail all self-determination of the individual - for its own selfish reasons.

Marcellus holds what may be a minority view but holds it very firmly.  He holds the view that we are essentially spiritual beings temporarily inhabiting bodies on Earth and that we came to Earth not just to exist and consume but to grow and improve as people with growing wisdom and decency in carrying out our life’s tasks and aims - and that this duty is on each one of us as individuals because we shall be answerable in due course for how we have discharged our duties.

Marcellus also holds therefore that the individual is supreme and that the State is only to be allowed to continue to exist while it serves those needs of the individual see here for earlier post on this.  And indeed he holds that we have a duty to overthrow the State if it interferes with our life’s tasks and aims.

The very basis of our destiny as human beings is our power of self-determination.  It is our birthright.       

To seek to deny our birthright of self-determination is not just wrong - it is a spiritual crime.

In view of this attack on the self-determination of the individual and this process of increasingly lowering us to the level of mindless cattle to be milked for its benefit, the Controlling State has lost the right to govern us. 

The Controlling State has stopped serving us, and has become a parasite.

On this basis the aims and activities of the Controlling State are essentially anti-spiritual and immoral and should be stopped. 

The Controlling State has become the problem and therefore has no right to continue to exist in its current form. 

If it will not change, it must be changed.

I will NOT accept . . . . .

Message to the Beast of 10 Downing Street and his criminal gang


You have abused our trust

You were given power to make our lives and the lives of our families better - but you ba***rds  abused it and used it for yourselves.

You were given our money to make our lives and the lives of our families better - but you ba***rds abused it and used it for yourselves.

You are filth.

You have broken the Social Contract.  The deal is off.

You try to lecture us on everything. You lying, cheating, hypocritical, bullying, thieving, immoral, immature, criminal scum.  You are not fit to lecture anyone.

Stopped listening now.

Accordingly. . . . . . . . .

I will NOT accept Labour morality or values on ANYTHING.

I will NOT willingly cooperate with ANY Labour administrative operation or initiative - unless I happen to I want to.

I will NOT accept Labour’s immoral definition of sexism.

I will NOT accept Labour’s immoral definition of racism.

I will NOT celebrate homosexuality.

I will NOT celebrate diversity.

I will NOT accept the deliberate Islamification and ruination of my society.

I will NOT assist the police willingly under ANY circumstances - unless I happen to want to.

I will NOT acknowledge the legality of ANY criminal offence enacted since 1 May 1997 - unless I happen to agree with it.

I will NOT acknowledge the legality or jurisdiction of any justice system that seeks to enforce any criminal offence that I consider to be unfair.

I will NOT willingly accept any racial quotas.

I will NOT willingly accept any gender quotas.

I will NOT agree to any more immigrants coming into this country.  Not one more.

I will NOT willingly accept any Labour policy that I consider intentionally and deliberately damaging to my family or community.

I will NOT accept that the Left have any right to control and distort broadcast news and political opinion.  The right to truthful information is a human right.

Easy solution to falling poll lead

The way to stop the Tories' poll lead falling is very simple.

Announce the following two policies:-

1. An In-Out EU referendum within 2 months of the election.

2. An immediate and total halt to immigration.

The Brits no longer think for themselves

Brits nowadays rely entirely on the TV to tell them what to think on every conceivable subject.

The TV has a very malign effect on people.  It makes them totally and completely passive.
 
Look at the amazing effect of Red Nose Day.  The TV tells them to get excited about it - and they do.

Celebrities are everywhere.  These people do not necessarily have any personal, ethical or spiritual value.  However they have appeared repeatedly on the TV and so the Brits follow their every move.  Their importance and value is grossly exaggerated.

It appeared on the TV, so the Brits watch it and their dulled minds are fascinated.

The tiny group of broadcasters give us ready packaged opinions on every conceivable subject; their views on houses, clothing, the arts, decoration, cars, morality, food, sport, bird watching, royalty, history, national identity and so on and so on have colossal influence on countless millions of people.

The Brits now seem to have a hole in their minds.  They do not think for themselves any more, but rely on the TV to give them thoughts and opinions.

It is all deeply pernicious, weakening and softening.

People sit down in front of the TV after a tiring day's work and after having their evening meal, possibly with a drink, and get very relaxed.  In such a condition they are very open to the suggestions made.  It is like a mild form of trance.  Therapeutic hypnosis is only different in the level of trance induced.

The Brits are like brainwashed zombies.

Eckhart Tolle, the spiritual teacher, has specifically referred to the weakening effect of TV on creativity.

You stare at the screen for hours on end, and your own mind activity completely subsides.... you are linking in to a collectively produced mindstream of a lot of mental activity.... its not yours - you have given up yours, you let yourself be taken over by someone else's mindstream....and you are in a state of semi-consciousness, so it is relaxing, and eventually it depletes you of energy and creatively

Never in human history has such a small number of people had such power to influence such vast numbers of people instantaneously.

This little clique of broadcasters think they are so superior and so enlightened that only they have the correct opinions and so they have a divine right to "educate" the proles into thinking the right things.  Wouldn't do if all the proles out there could say what they want. Got to stop the wrong opinions being heard - in the interests of the people of course.  They ruthlessly manipulate the information.

But who are the people who control this phenemenal power?

Why should these particular people be the ones to control such a power?  

It is probably the most awesome and tne most powerful mind-bending force in the history of the world, yet we the people have no agreed democratic system of ensuring that only the best in our society should have this trust of influencing our children and indeed ourselves.

Then how did they get their present positions?

They were appointed.

Who appointed them?

Other people who were themselves appointed.

Why did they get this power? Did they get elected?  No. They are all self-appointed and self-generating.

We never get a say in who controls this power.  Why not? 

People never question it.  Why not?  Because that thought has not appeared on the TV!!!

Dumb Brits.  One despairs of the supine, pathetic Brits, whose society is being destroyed around them - and they watch on with stupid, vacant, glassy stares.  How spiritually degrading. Forgotten their heritage, forgotten their birthright.

The tiny few control how countless millions think.

Time to democratise this monster.

The Left do not wish to improve our society - but to destroy it

(This Marcellus article was originally guested on Captain Ranty.)

People have completely misunderstood the Left.

The Left do not want to improve society or make things work better.  On the contrary, they actively want to degrade the conditions of life to create chaos, dissatisfaction and hopefully disintegration so they can impose a “new society”.

This “new society” means the State having uncontrolled power over the individual.

To this end our society has been intentionally changed, corrupted and degraded by the Left.

By their total control of broadcasting the Left has been presented as morally superior.  How silly, when in fact the Left is a totally malign force.  What wonderful words they spoke; but they never meant them.  Their activities are characterised by shameless deceit and corruption, and systematic lying.

Because of the total control of broadcasting by the Left, very few people have realised that a long, subtle campaign has been conducted against our society and way of life by the Left who have wanted to change this society irreversibly to their own structures against the wishes of the people.  This campaign is called the Project.

After the failure of the miner’s strike in the mid 1980s, the Left decided that English society was too strong, and too cohesive with traditions that were too deep. They realised that the people were too content for the Left to succeed with a forcible revolution to impose their new society on us.  That is why they spit out the name “Thatcher” with so much hate - because for a short while she thwarted their plans.

The Left never went away however, they simply changed tack.  They put suits on and went into normal jobs, such as the media - particularly broadcasting - and as opinion-formers and columnists in the print MSM.

Whilst a Labour member on the Lothian Regional Council in Edinburgh, Alistair Darling at the age of 29 (in 1985) was on the extreme left.  Bob Thompson, former chairman of the Scottish Labour Party, has said that "he (Darling) was a Trotskyist".  Even Kinnock called him a "bearded Trot".  But then Darling put on a suit and joined New Labour - and now he is Chancellor and he nationalised the banks.

They decided to play a long game and undermine society from within so it would decay, and then they could move to impose their “new society”.  They never ever give up.

In short, the English had to be made less content and comfortable.

So although the Left have always talked the language of fairness, compassion, social justice and improving conditions for the under privileged, they were NEVER interested in making our institutions work or improving the living conditions of the people.  That was the very last thing they wanted.  They wanted more and more discontent.  They emphasised every division and grievance in society and created new ones all the time, not to cure them but to create more and more discontent and division to corrode our society.  They set group against group, fanning resentments.  They promoted anything that weakened society.  Now they emphasise and enhance ethnic divisions.  They always divide, never heal.  They destroy, never build.

I am not talking here about the enormous number of naïve, leftish people who wish to proclaim to the world that they are “better than” and like to wear a “Left” T-shirt because they are duped into believing the deceitful rhetoric of justice, equality and so on (“useful fools” as Stalin is reputed to have called them), but the leaders of the Left (in both the Labour Party and the LibDems), who are really wicked people and who will do anything to undermine the present order to impose the “new society” that their hard Left lecturers fired them up with at college during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s. 

Common Purpose is one of their main tools of quiet undermining, contamination and corrosion.  Do not underestimate this organisation.

In the early 1980s the Left was very much against the EEC (as was) as they thought that it would stop their intentions of being able to impose their views on the rest of us.  Blair’s election address during the 1980s showed he was very much against the EEC.  But then they realised that actually the hidden intention of the EEC - to destroy the existing societies of member states - was rather similar to their own, and so they abruptly changed in the mid 1980s and became true EEC believers.  The federal European project therefore became their project.  Anyone then against any part of the federal European project had to be silenced by the Left controlled media and was labelled mad and mentally ill.

All the dirty tricks of the EEC, later the EU, to undermine our society were then added to their own dirty tricks to achieve the same aim.

Their first aim was to take over the broadcast news programmes.  They (including Mandelson) succeeded in doing this spectacularly well and from then on these programmes were used ruthlessly to promote the Project.

1. Every tradition, every national icon, in fact all the glue that bound our society so happily had to be undermined.

2. Decent, responsible people had to be discouraged from taking any action.

3. The confidence of the individual had to be shaken.  Uncertainty and fear was deliberately created by the introduction of unreasonable rules and unfair enforcement.

4. By means of a target culture, all public services were corrupted and made to serve Labour’s PR needs and not the people

5. All institutions had to be “modernised” even though they worked fine, to tear away all traditions and roots.

6. All patriotism, all pride in our country, all mention of England or anything English, all positive role models from the past, all our history, customs and traditions were to be sneered at and degraded so no-one could speak of them in a positive way.

"To destroy a people you must first sever their roots.”

Alexander Solzhenitsyn

There was a completely successful secret campaign to undermine our society, our culture, our institutions, our traditions. Peter Hitchens, himself a former communist, is well aware of the inside story here and of this campaign, and has written about it recently in a piece on ConHome.

This culminated in the audacious plan to change the people of England who were so awkward.  The aim was to deliberately destroy social cohesion - at whatever cost in human misery.  Nothing less than cultural genocide. “The Final Solution to the English Problem”.  Together with the support of the EU - who have the same aim - they embarked on a massive immigration plan using on the one hand the decency and tolerance of the English people and on the other hand their control of the broadcast media to brand anyone who objected as a racist. It was brilliant and supremely successful.

Interesting that both Labour and the LibDems reject any cap on immigration and that the LibDems have even called for an amnesty for illegal immigrants.

The strength of our society has always been its social cohesion and with this we have seen off all invasions for nearly a thousand years.  This social cohesion has now been broken.  Deliberately.

As the next stage in the imposition of the “new society” (the “post democratic age” as Mandelson calls it) our hard won civil liberties have been systematically and deliberately dismantled - to increase the power of the State.

The planning for the Project has been meticulous and detailed.  Each stage, or click of the ratchet, has been kept very small so that it is not frightening on its own, and always some fake high principled reason is given for it - but cumulatively the increase in the uncontrolled power of the State over the individual has been colossal.  Hitler used the same technique in the early 1930s.

This country is facing the most dangerous situation since 1940 and the job of the Labour controlled broadcast media is to send the people to sleep and stop them realising.  Doing it very well too.

It is interesting to note that after Brown has had 13 years of completely unrestrained power and huge sums of money to use, the Government's own National Equality Panel (set up by Harman) reported in January 2010 that inequality in income has reached the highest level since records began in 1961, and probably since the end of the Second World War. It also concludes that inequality in Britain is among the worst in the developed world, with the highest rate of poverty in western Europe.

Brown’s work whilst in power for 13 years has not been to improve the conditions of the poor who trusted his lies and sweet words (apart from doing enough to stay in power), but to facilitate the imposition of this “new society”.

In this Brown has been a great success, as he has caused the most amazing and possibly irreparable damage, corruption and corrosion in every aspect of our society and in the lives of the people of this country - all done to impose the Project on the English.  As the pictures of that time show, he has never smiled so widely as the day he nationalised the Banks; that for once was a genuine smile.

He has blighted the lives of countless millions of his own countrymen, simply to advance his own obsessions and interests.

Brown has been at the heart of this work, and he is a truly evil man.

Labour would not have survived nor would the Project have achieved all it has done in undermining our society, without the Left being able to control broadcasting.

This has only been done because the key people who control broadcasting have been part of the Project.  They have planted their supporters in every position of power within all the news and current affairs programmes (and that is to say nothing about the subliminal messages given out in every soap and drama programme). These people must be removed from all positions of power and influence within broadcasting.

The only hope for democracy in this country is to destroy the Left’s stranglehold on broadcasting.

This power has enabled them to corrupt our whole constitution.

If that grip on broadcasting is left intact, there is no hope.

After a busy, tiring day’s work, people are very relaxed when they watch the TV and so when they hear the drip, drip, drip of Left opinions, agenda manipulation and misinformation they are in what amounts to a light trance.  This means the message of the programme is absorbed (and accepted) easier.  A gentle brainwashing.  Therapeutic hypnotism is really only different in the degree of trance.  This is a mighty power in the hands of anyone.

It is not acceptable in a modern, information-based democracy that a few unaccountable, unrepresentative, unelected, self-appointed placemen are allowed to control the most awesome, influential, mind-bending power in the history of mankind.  What are we thinking of, to allow such a situation to continue?  There can be no genuine and free democracy while this continues.

They control virtually all the political information that probably 85% of people get; what is mentioned and how it is presented.  They can manipulate it how they wish; and do so ruthlessly.

The astonishing power of broadcasting to influence political opinion is something completely new to our constitution and democracy.  Constitutional checks and balances developed over centuries are routinely sidestepped by this new phenomenon and have been rendered useless.

Broadcasting is now part of the political process, whether the broadcasters like it or not.

There is no democratic legitimacy authorising the people who currently control broadcasting and our information, to continue to do so.  They have simply been appointed by people who themselves were appointed . . . and so on.

If the Left's control of broadcasting is not destroyed, the broadcasters will destroy Cameron - however large his majority - and then the Left will be back again.

The first aim of our resistance to this process is therefore to destroy completely the monopoly power of Labour over broadcast news programmes.  Remember, there is no democratic control over these programmes - we get what they allow us to have.  This must change.

Control broadcasting, control the minds.
Control the minds, control the country.

Therefore the key battleground of the fight against the Left is now over who controls broadcasting.  They know that - but the non-Left do not really understand it.

If the Left loses their monopoly over broadcasting - we have a chance.  If not, then our society is lost.

One way of doing this is to open up the broadcasting infrastructure (like BT) to many, many news providers.  This is an extension of localism.  There is much more that can also be done.

It is not that it cannot be done, it is merely that there has not so far been the political will to do it.

However it is done, it must be done.

All passports issued after 1 May 1997 should be revoked

Immigration is a gift we bestow on those useful to the country.  It is no right.

Since we know that immigration has been used deliberately by Labour to destroy our society, the legality of all passports issued after 1 May 1997 must be in doubt.

All passports issued since 1 May 1997 to people who were not born in the UK should be revoked.

The rules under which passports will be issued should be completely modernised so only people we need here are allowed passports. (And that does not include cheap wage servants for people like "Baroness" Scotland.)

All those with revoked passports will be entitled to apply again, but the new rules of issue will apply.

No passport, no vote.

Why does no-one dare criticise the broadcasters?

The daily evidence of the catastrophe that has been caused to this country and our society by Labour is overwhelming.

If all this evidence were being put before the voters in fair, unbiassed broadcast news programmes, then this would utterly destroy Labour.

However, today another poll shows the Tory lead shortening yet again.

This is entirely due to the deliberate distortion in the news caused by the broadcasters.

Why does no-one in the political-media class say this?

There is much discussion in the media about the polls, but no-one mentions the distorting effect of the broadcasters and the scandal of the current broadcast news programmes.

The elephant in the room.

The non-Left seems scared stiff of breathing any criticism of the broadcasters. 

Pathetic.

How the Left will destroy a non-Left government

Labour and the Left have had a complete stranglehold on broadcasting - particularly broadcast news and current affairs - for at least the last 20 years.

The deliberate and deceitful manipulation and twisting of the news by a tiny clique of broadcasters to assist Labour electorally is a national and democratic outrage.

However large the majority of any non-Left government, the Left broadcasters will destroy it with a thousand cuts.

The success of a future non-Left government (presumably Tory just now) depends ENTIRELY on this stranglehold being destroyed.

Why Labour get away with it.

In spite of the countless deliberate evils caused to this society by Labour, they recover more and more in the  opinion polls.  They get away with all their crimes.

Why is this?

It is because of the constant corruption of the news by the BBC news department and the other broadcasters.

Everything Labour is presented as positive.

Everything Conservative is presented as negative.

No opposition can cope with this constant atrophying friction of hostile propaganda.  It wears down all opposition.

They have knowingly enabled Labour to destroy our society. They are active agents of the Project and they are the propaganda wing of Labour.

Why have we let them do this for the last 20 years or so?

Why do we let them continue?

It is because the Brits do not realise that they are being conned by the broadcasters.  The broadcasters are too clever.  The disaster is that few Brits even know that this is going on.

The Brits have been brainwashed.  Their minds are softened and weakened.

Unless the malign grip of the Left on broadcasting is UTTERLY broken we are lost as a society, as a nation and as a people.  The Romans never thought the Roman Empire would end.

Unless there is a miracle, we are being taken to a new Dark Age.

The BBC news department is now a pernicious cancer in our society.

BBC news department must be reformed from top to bottom and the cancer cut out.  IT CAN BE DONE.

The real political battle is over who controls the broadcast news programmes

It is surprising that any one is amazed that Labour keep recovering in the polls despite the devastation that 13 years of self-serving Labour rule has caused to every aspect of our society.

The reasons are as follows:

1.  Broadcast news is no longer a fair and helpful information service but has been corrupted by the Left into a vehicle for narrow and one sided political OPINION.

2.  All broadcast news programmes are now totally under the absolute and ruthless control of the Left (and have been for at least the last 20 years) who are determined to keep Labour in power.

3.  Accordingly, the broadcast news programmes are now little more than propaganda outlets promoting every Labour statement, initiative and story with complete sympathy, support and seriousness.  Every Labour reference suggests that Labour are normal and good and every Tory reference suggests that Tories are somehow untrustworthy, ineffective, dangerous or damaging.

4.  All manner of subtle but hugely effective manipulation and twisting is adopted.  For a fuller analysis see here.

5.  The hypnotic drip, drip, drip of this hostile propaganda from the broadcast news programmes wears away at all efforts from the Tories.  It is cumulatively atrophic.  The viewer quickly forgets the damage Labour has caused - as they are supposed to do.

**********

Many people seem unaware of this process - but unless it is corrected, our democracy will continue to be corrupted and we will progressively lose our freedom as individuals.

The broadcast news programmes are so critical to electoral success, that the real political battle is over who controls them.

The individual is supreme.

There is a fundamental divide between views of the role of the State.

First, there are those who take the gross materialist view that people are merely bodies, or little more than animals.  They will always believe that the State is there to make all major decisions for the little people.  They will always favour Big State and insist that the individual must serve the State; indeed they will think it so obvious that they will be outraged and angered by any other view.  That is the Left and Labour.

Secondly, there are those who think that people are more than mere animals and have lives on earth to develop and improve themselves.  Integral to this is that all of us must learn to exercise choice and responsibility in a myriad of ways.  This view holds that the State is there to provide the best environment for us to grow as people by learning to make choices and take responsibilities.  This view will be attracted to localism.

Marcellus holds that the individual is supreme. 

He holds that people are more than mere animals and have lives on earth to develop and improve themselves.

The individual is therefore of greater primacy than the State.

The State is there to serve the individual.

The State is merely a temporary facility which we allow to have power only if it is helpful to us in our life’s duties and tasks.

If the State ceases to be useful in this respect, we have a moral DUTY to withdraw support from it and if necessary to destroy it - particularly if it interferes with our life’s tasks and aims.

Following our life’s aims is a higher moral duty than blindly obeying the State.

If the State then turns renegade and attacks the citizens to compel subservience, the State and any officers of the State who seek to enforce the will of the State are terrorists.